lasaswriter.blogg.se - Ati radeon 2400 xt specs

ATI RADEON 2400 XT SPECS FULL
ATI RADEON 2400 XT SPECS SOFTWARE

64-bit memory bus, one 64-bit controller.

Theoretical texture sampling rate: 4.8 gigatexel per second.

Maximum theoretical fillrate: 2.4 gigapixel per second.

Effective memory frequency: 800 MHz (2*400 MHz).

TV-Out, HDTV-Out, HDCP support, HDMI adapter.

2 × DVI-I Dual Link, 2560×1600 video output.

Theoretical texture sampling rate: 6.4 gigatexel per second.

Maximum theoretical fillrate: 3.2 gigapixel per second.

Integrated support for two RAMDACs, two Dual Link DVI ports, HDMI, HDTV.

Peak performance is up to 4 samples per cycles, Z only mode - 8 samples per cycle

ATI RADEON 2400 XT SPECS SOFTWARE

4 ROPs supporting antialiasing with software fetches of more than 16 samples per pixel, including FP16 or FP32 frame buffer formats.

Dynamic branching in pixel and vertex shaders.

ATI RADEON 2400 XT SPECS FULL

8 bilinear filtering units, which can filter FP16 textures at full speed and support trilinear and anisotropic filtering for all texture formats.

40 TMUs (see the details in the baseline article).

16 texture address units (see the details in the baseline article).

2 texture units, support for FP16 and FP32 components in textures.

120 scalar floating point ALUs (integer and floating point formats, FP32 precision according to IEEE 754).

128-bit memory bus, two 64-bit controllers.

Hardware DirectX 10 support, including new Shader Model 4.0, geometry shaders and stream output.

Unified architecture with an array of common processors for streaming processing of vertices, pixels, and other data types.

Hardware Graphics System of the Future.

DX.Next: the Nearest Future of Hardware 3D Acceleration.

DirectX.Update - 3D graphics accelerators: Half Step Forward.

Longhorn - Graphics Cards and Shaders for DirectX 10.

A lot of assumptions about future solutions were also correct. These articles predicted the current situation with GPU architectures. Now the matter depends on sufficient shipments of the new graphics cards to retailers.īefore you read this article, we traditionally suggest that you should read all previous reviews of solutions based on the unified architectures as well as baseline articles DX Current, DX Next and Longhorn that describe various aspects of modern graphics cards and architectural peculiarities of NVIDIA and ATI(AMD) products. This very process technology probably delayed the launch of these solutions on the market. It reduces prime costs, which is relevant for inexpensive products. The main difference from the top R600 GPUs is the 65 nm process technology used to manufacture the RV630/RV610. Not much time passed since their initial announcement. It inevitably affects sales, market share of the company, and its financial welfare.Īnd now time has come for AMD's low-end and mid-end solutions with DirectX 10 support to enter the market.

R6xx had the same fate as the R5xx solutions.

Since that time the company has been always behindhand with its releases. Common users derived only benefit from it - they regularly got decent products from two companies. Since that time and until 2005 we had been watching the interesting fight between two strong competitors.

The fall was also caused by some mistakes made by NVIDIA (remember the failure of GeForce FX). Those times ended with the advance of brilliant R3xx chips and RADEON 9x00 graphics cards from ATI. The time of NVIDIA's domination came after 3dfx had died down in 2000-2001. It's so sad to watch ATI gradually give ground to NVIDIA since 2005. The other graphics cards and GPUs based on the unified R6xx architecture were delayed, we were provided only with theoretical information. Although the AMD R6xx architecture had been announced in May, only the top R600-based solution appeared on the market at that time.